Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Ode to a Nightingale

Away! away! for I will fly to thee,
Not charioted by Bacchus and his pards,
But on the viewless wings of Poesy,
Though the dull brain perplexes and retards:
Already with thee! tender is the night,
And haply the Queen-Moon is on her throne,
Cluster’d around by all her starry Fays;
But here there is no light,
Save what from heaven is with the breezes blown
Through verdurous glooms and winding mossy ways.


This ode was inspired after Keats heard the song of a nightingale while staying with a friend in the country. This poem was also written after the death of his brother and the many references to death in this poem are a reflection of this. Among the thematic concerns in this poem is the wish to escape life through different routes. Although the poem begins by describing the song of an actual nightingale, the nightingale goes on to become a symbol of the immortality of nature.

The poet suddenly cries out "Away! away! for I will fly to thee." He turns to fantasy again; he rejects wine in line 2, and in line 3 he announces he is going to use "the viewless wings of Poesy" to join a fantasy bird. In choosing Poesy, is he calling on analytical or scientific reasoning, on poetry and imagination, on passion, on sensuality, or on some something else?

He contrasts this mode of experience (poetry) to the "dull brain" that "perplexes and retards" (line 4); what way of approaching life does this line reject? What kinds of activities is the brain often associated with, in contrast to the heart, which is associated with emotion?

In line 5, he succeeds or seems to succeed in joining the bird. The imagined world described in the rest of the stanza is dark; what qualities are associated with this darkness, e.g., is it frightening, safe, attractive, empty, fulfilling, sensuous, alive?


2 comments:

  1. To start, I would like to say I am jealous because of how much material you have. I was looking everywhere for things people wrote about the stanza I picked but couldn't find much anywhere. Maybe it was just the wrong stanza.

    The way this looks like an actual essay is cool too. Funny how teachers can spot out when people plagarize, but when I look at it, it looks like good literature that maybe you did or maybe you didn't write.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You did a good job on linking four different cites into one smooth and coherent analysis. I would suspect you were the person who wrote it if you did not provide it with links. You made each cite link together by ordering each paragraph by lines in the poem. Overall, your analysis provide a nice reading of the poem. However, one thing I should point out is that, I do not think you are needed to cite the original poem. As Mindi dicussed in class, you do not need to cite a source that is “common knowledge”, which means when you can find three or more links that offer the same material, you can just put in your work without any citation.

    ReplyDelete